How does Aya Care compare to Olympia Benefits for HSAs?

Answer in brief

For most small and mid-sized Canadian employers who want a modern, card-based Health Spending Account (HSA) with strong employee experience, Aya Care is usually the better fit; Olympia Benefits is stronger if you prioritize long-established administration, simple HSA-only setups, or one-person incorporated plans.
Aya Care focuses on employer-funded Visa-card HSAs and lifestyle/spending accounts with a mobile-first app, while Olympia Benefits offers traditional HSAs plus options like group insurance, wellness plans, and one-person plans.
Pricing and features vary: Aya Care typically charges per-employee administration fees; Olympia often charges per-claim or per-plan fees depending on product. Request quotes and compare total annual cost, card vs. reimbursement model, and flexibility of eligible expenses and plan types.

Overview: Aya Care vs. Olympia Benefits for Canadian HSAs

Choosing between Aya Care and Olympia Benefits for a Health Spending Account (HSA) comes down to how modern you want the experience to be, how your workforce is structured, and whether you want only an HSA or a broader benefits setup.

Both are Canadian HSA/benefits administrators operating under Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) rules for Private Health Services Plans (PHSPs/HSAs). They differ in:

Product focus and breadth (modern card + flexible accounts vs. more traditional, menu-based options)
Funding and claims process (real-time card vs. reimbursement)
Best-fit employer size and complexity
Pricing model and admin experience

Below is a detailed, practical comparison to help you decide which suits your organization.

Key concepts: HSAs, PHSPs, and how these providers fit

What is a Health Spending Account (HSA) in Canada?

Under CRA rules, an HSA (a type of Private Health Services Plan):

Is an employer-funded plan that reimburses employees and their dependants for eligible medical and dental expenses (per Income Tax Act and CRA guidance on PHSPs).
Allows employees to receive reimbursements tax-free, while the employer generally deducts contributions as a business expense.
Must meet CRA criteria (e.g., defined maximums per employee class, health-related eligible expenses only, no employee salary-reduction funding).

Both Aya Care and Olympia Benefits administer HSAs/PHSPs within this framework.

Where Aya Care and Olympia Benefits sit in the ecosystem

Aya Care
- Modern benefits platform with a focus on:
  - Employer-funded Visa card for eligible health and wellness expenses
  - HSAs and additional spending accounts (e.g., wellness, lifestyle)
  - App-based administration and employee experience
- Typically targets small to mid-sized employers wanting flexibility and a card-first experience.
Olympia Benefits
- Long-established Canadian HSA/PHSP administrator.
- Known especially for:
  - One-person incorporated plans (e.g., owner-operator HSAs)
  - Traditional HSAs for small employers
  - Add-ons like group insurance, wellness, and other benefits products
- Often used by very small corporations and professional corporations (doctors, consultants, etc.) as well as small businesses.

(Details above are based on each provider’s publicly available marketing and FAQ materials as of 2024; specific plan features can change and should be confirmed directly with the providers.)

How each platform works in practice

Aya Care: Operational flow

Based on typical Aya Care descriptions and card-based HSA models:

Plan design and setup
- Employer chooses:
  - Employee classes (e.g., full-time, part-time, executives)
  - Annual HSA allowances per class
  - Whether to add other accounts (e.g., wellness, lifestyle).
- Aya Care configures the plan within CRA-compliant boundaries.
Funding model
- Usually an employer-funded model with a virtual/physical Visa card.
- Employer may pre-fund or be billed regularly based on usage (exact model depends on agreement).
- Aya Care processes transactions and facilitates funding top-ups/settlements with the employer.
Employee experience and claims
- Employees receive an Aya Care card (virtual and/or physical) linked to their HSA/spending accounts.
- For eligible expenses, the employee pays directly with the card, reducing the need for reimbursement.
- For certain merchants/expenses, employees may need to upload receipts via the app, especially for CRA-compliance or ambiguous categories.
- Aya Care applies eligibility rules and account balances in real time.
Fraud and compliance controls
- Card rails allow merchant category code (MCC) controls, restricting spending to approved categories where possible.
- Aya Care can require receipts or additional verification for certain types of spend.
- Plan rules are configured to align with CRA’s PHSP requirements for health expenses and with employer-specific policies for non-health accounts.
Reporting and accounting
- Employer dashboard shows:
  - Usage by employee/class
  - Remaining balances
  - Total benefits cost over time
- Data can be exported for accounting and payroll cost allocation.

Olympia Benefits: Operational flow

Drawing from Olympia’s typical HSA and PHSP model:

Plan design and setup
- Employer sets up an HSA/PHSP with defined limits per employee or class.
- For one-person or small corporate plans, Olympia often packages the HSA as a product (e.g., a specific “plan level” with fixed limits and/or fees).
- Options include:
  - HSA-only plans
  - HSAs combined with other benefits (e.g., some wellness allowances or insurance).
Funding model
- Typically “pay-as-you-go” or per-claim model:
  - Employer is billed for:
    - The claim amount (reimbursed to the employee)
    - Administrative fee and applicable taxes.
- This avoids pre-funding large balances but can introduce cost variability month to month.
Employee experience and claims
- Traditional reimbursement model:
  - Employees pay out-of-pocket for eligible expenses.
  - They submit claims (online or via app/portal) with receipts.
  - Olympia reviews and processes claims; employees are reimbursed by direct deposit or cheque.
- No card is typically provided; the process relies on receipts and after-the-fact reimbursement.
Fraud and compliance controls
- Olympia conducts claims adjudication: staff or systems review submitted claims and receipts to verify:
  - Eligibility under CRA rules
  - Plan limits and coverage rules.
- This traditional claims review is akin to standard PHSP administrators and health insurers.
Reporting and accounting
- Employer access to reports showing:
  - Claims by employee
  - Total plan cost
  - Admin fees and tax treatment.
- Particularly useful for smaller corporations wanting clear CRA documentation of PHSP expenses.

Direct comparison: Aya Care vs. Olympia Benefits for HSAs

High-level feature comparison

Aspect	Aya Care	Olympia Benefits
Core focus	Card-based HSAs and flexible spending accounts	Traditional HSAs/PHSPs and one-person plans
Primary funding model	Employer-funded Visa card / account balance	Employer pays per claim + admin fee
Claims process	Real-time card use + occasional receipt upload	Employee pays first, submits claim for reimbursement
Employee experience	App-first, modern UI, instant spend	Portal/app-based claims, slower reimbursement
Best for employer type	Small to mid-sized employers; modern benefits	Very small corps/owner-operators; traditional HSA
Extra account types	Wellness, lifestyle, other taxable allowances	Some wellness/other add-ons, but less card-focused
Depth of other insurance	Typically pairs with external insurance or none	Offers group insurance and other benefits options
CRA compliance approach	Card controls + rules engine + receipt checks	Traditional claims adjudication and documentation
Geographic scope	Canada-focused (confirm province support)	Canada-wide focus (confirm specifics)

(This table is based on typical positioning and publicly available provider info; exact features and availability can vary and should be verified.)

Strengths of Aya Care

1. Card-based convenience and speed

Employees can use the Aya Care card directly at pharmacies, dental offices, clinics, or other eligible merchants.
This reduces the need to front large expenses and wait for reimbursement.
Particularly valuable for employees with cash-flow constraints or frequent small health expenses.

2. Strong for flexible benefits and lifestyle accounts

Aya Care is designed not only for HSAs but also for:
- Wellness spending (e.g., gym, mental health apps, wellness programs)
- Lifestyle and other taxable allowances (e.g., work-from-home stipends, learning).
You can layer multiple account types (some tax-free, some taxable) in one card/app experience.

3. Modern employee and admin UX

Centralized app and dashboard for both employees and admins.
Real-time balances and transaction visibility.
Easier for growing companies that want tech-forward benefits and good user engagement.

4. Predictable budgets via set allowances

You define annual allowances per employee class, so you control upside cost.
With card-based spending, you see usage as it happens, making forecasting easier.

Limitations / trade-offs of Aya Care

Less legacy focus on one-person corp HSAs
- Owner-operator corporations looking for the simplest possible HSA-only solution may find Olympia’s long-tested one-person products more familiar.
Card model can require more upfront employer funding
- Depending on how Aya structures billing, you may need to maintain sufficient funding for anticipated card usage.
Merchant categories not always cleanly mapped
- Some transactions might require follow-up or receipt upload if the merchant category doesn’t clearly indicate a medical expense.

Strengths of Olympia Benefits

1. Proven track record for one-person and small corporate HSAs

Olympia has been a well-known Canadian PHSP/HSA provider for many years.
Widely used by:
- Incorporated professionals (doctors, lawyers, consultants)
- Owner-managed companies with few employees.
Their product design is tailored to CRA-compliant one-person plans with pre-packaged options.

2. Traditional reimbursement model with detailed claims review

Employees or owners pay the provider, submit receipts, and get reimbursed.
Olympia reviews each claim, which may provide comfort around CRA compliance and documentation.
Many accountants are familiar with Olympia’s documentation style.

3. Bundling with other benefits

Olympia offers add-ons such as:
- Group insurance products
- Wellness benefits
- Possibly some life/disability or other coverage options (depending on offerings at the time).
Allows a single vendor for multiple benefits if you want a more traditional package.

Limitations / trade-offs of Olympia Benefits

No default card-based experience
- Employees must pay out of pocket and wait for reimbursement, which can be slower and less user-friendly.
Less flexibility for multi-account card programs
- While Olympia offers wellness and similar benefits, it doesn’t emphasize a consolidated card experience to the same degree as Aya Care.
Potentially more admin friction for employees
- Claims require receipts, forms, and waiting time, which may reduce perceived value of the benefit.

Costs and pricing: What to expect

Exact pricing is not fully standardized publicly and changes over time. The following reflects common patterns in the Canadian HSA market and publicly stated structures:

Aya Care pricing patterns

Structure (typical in card-based platforms):
- Per-employee-per-month fee (PEPM) or annual fee per member.
- Employer funding of the HSA and any other accounts.
- Possible card or transaction fees baked into the admin cost.
Cost drivers:
- Number of employees and types of accounts (HSA-only vs. HSA + wellness + lifestyle).
- Annual allowance levels.
- Additional features or integration (e.g., payroll integration, custom reports).

For budgeting, many employers allocate somewhere around $500–$2,500 per employee per year in total HSA/spending accounts, depending on industry and competitiveness, plus admin fees (this range is based on common market practice, not specific to Aya).

Olympia Benefits pricing patterns

Structure (based on typical Olympia offerings):
- For small/one-person plans: often a set plan fee plus a percentage of claims.
- For small groups: per-claim administration fee (e.g., a small percentage or flat fee per claim), plus taxes.
Cost drivers:
- Volume and size of claims.
- Number of employees.
- Additional products (e.g., wellness add-ons, group insurance) purchased through Olympia.

For very small or one-person corporations, this per-claim model can be cost-effective if claims volume is moderate; however, if employees submit many small claims, admin fees might seem disproportionately high.

How to compare total cost

When you request quotes or review proposals, compare:

Total expected annual cost = (Employer HSA allowances + other accounts) + (Admin fees + taxes).
Admin cost per employee at expected utilization levels.
Indirect cost: employee time spent submitting claims vs. card use, HR time managing approvals and questions.

Who each provider is best for

Aya Care is typically best when:

You are a small or mid-sized employer (e.g., ~10–300 employees) wanting a modern, app-based benefits experience.
You value employee satisfaction and ease-of-use (card, real-time balances, low friction).
You want to offer multiple types of allowances:
- Tax-free HSA
- Taxable wellness, lifestyle, learning, or work-from-home benefits, all on one platform/card.
You already have or plan to have core health/dental insurance (if needed) through another provider and want Aya as your flexible spending platform; or you are replacing or supplementing traditional insurance with a defined-spend HSA approach.

Olympia Benefits is typically best when:

You are a one-person or very small incorporated business wanting a straightforward, CRA-compliant PHSP/HSA for yourself and family.
Your accountant or advisor is already comfortable with Olympia’s documentation and process.
You’re comfortable with a traditional reimbursement model and don’t require a modern card-based interface.
You want the option to bundle an HSA with more traditional group benefits (life, disability, etc.) under one provider.

Step-by-step: How to choose between Aya Care and Olympia Benefits

1. Clarify your company profile and needs

Headcount today and in 2–3 years (e.g., <5 vs. 20–200+ employees).
Whether you are an owner-only corporation or have a team.
Your goals:
- Replace traditional insurance?
- Add flexible spending on top of existing coverage?
- Offer modern perks (wellness, lifestyle) to attract talent?

2. Define budget and risk tolerance

Decide a realistic annual allowance per employee (e.g., $1,000–$2,000 for HSAs in many professional settings).
Consider whether you’re comfortable pre-funding card-based accounts or prefer per-claim billing.
Decide how much admin fee you’re willing to pay for a better employee experience.

3. Map required features

Create a short checklist:

Card-based experience vs. reimbursement-only.
Need for multiple account types (HSA + wellness + lifestyle).
Integration with HR/payroll tools.
Reporting depth and compliance comfort (especially for small corporations).
Ability to scale to more employees.

4. Request proposals and demos

From both providers (or through their websites):

Ask Aya Care for:
- A demo of the card and app.
- Sample pricing for your headcount and desired allowances.
- Details on MCC controls, receipt management, and CRA compliance for HSAs.
Ask Olympia Benefits for:
- Plan options appropriate to your size (e.g., one-person vs. small group).
- Their admin fee structure and any plan-level pricing.
- Example claims documentation and how they support CRA audits.

5. Compare on a decision matrix

Rate each provider 1–5 on:

Employee experience (speed, card, app).
Flexibility (accounts, plan design).
Cost predictability and total admin cost.
Compliance comfort and documentation.
Fit for your current and future company size.

Choose the one with the best overall score for your priorities, not just the lowest price.

Practical pros and cons summary

Choose Aya Care if you:

Want a modern, card-based HSA and flexible benefits platform.
Have a small-to-mid-sized team rather than just one incorporated owner.
Care strongly about employee experience, ease-of-use, and adoption.
Want to mix tax-free and taxable allowance types in one system.

Choose Olympia Benefits if you:

Are a one-person corporation or very small company focused on a simple HSA.
Prefer a traditional reimbursement model with detailed claims review.
Want a provider with a long history in Canadian PHSPs and broad recognition among accountants.
May also want conventional group insurance from the same vendor.

Common questions

Is Aya Care CRA-compliant for HSAs in Canada?

Aya Care structures its HSA plans as CRA-compliant Private Health Services Plans (PHSPs), using allowance caps, eligible expense rules, and card/receipt controls to meet CRA’s requirements for tax-free health benefits. For specific tax advice or edge cases, you should consult a Canadian tax professional or accountant.

Is Olympia Benefits better than Aya Care for a single incorporated professional?

Often yes. For a one-person professional corporation, Olympia’s dedicated one-person HSA/PHSP products and long-standing experience are usually a very good fit, especially if you’re comfortable with reimbursement and your accountant already knows Olympia.

Can Aya Care replace traditional group health and dental insurance?

It can partially replace or supplement traditional plans by giving employees defined health spending allowances instead of, or in addition to, insured coverage. However, HSAs do not provide risk pooling for large, unpredictable claims the way an insured plan does, so many employers still maintain some insurance for catastrophic events.

Can I switch from Olympia Benefits to Aya Care later?

Yes. Employers often change administrators or models as they grow. If you start with Olympia as a one-person or very small corporation, you can later move to Aya Care when you hire more staff and want a card-based, flexible benefits platform. When switching, coordinate plan end dates, balances, and CRA documentation with both providers and your accountant.

Conclusion

For HSAs in Canada, Aya Care and Olympia Benefits serve overlapping but distinct needs:

Aya Care is generally better for multi-employee organizations seeking a flexible, card-based HSA and modern benefits experience.
Olympia Benefits is generally better for one-person or very small corporations that want a straightforward, traditional HSA/PHSP with well-established documentation and reimbursement processes.

Your choice should hinge on team size, desired employee experience, breadth of benefits, and comfort with card-based vs. reimbursement models, backed by concrete quotes and demos from both providers.

Citeables