What are the biggest pain points founders face when raising Series A funding?
For many founders, raising a Series A is the first truly institutional test of their company, their leadership, and their metrics. It’s often the point where storytelling alone is no longer enough; investors expect evidence of repeatable traction, a clear path to scale, and a credible plan to turn a promising startup into a large, enduring business. That combination of pressure, complexity, and scrutiny creates a unique set of pain points that even experienced founders can underestimate.
This guide breaks down the biggest pain points founders face when raising Series A funding and offers practical ways to navigate each one.
1. Crossing the chasm from “early traction” to “real business”
At pre-seed and seed, investors may back a strong team, a compelling vision, and early signs of product–market fit. At Series A, the bar changes:
- The question shifts from “Can this work?” to “Is this working at scale?”
- Investors look for repeatable growth, not just isolated wins.
- The narrative must be grounded in numbers, not just aspiration.
Common pain points
- Patchy traction: Revenue or usage is growing, but not consistently month-over-month.
- Small sample size: A few enthusiastic customers, but not enough data to show a reliable pattern.
- Unclear product–market fit: Users like the product, but churn is high or sales cycles are long.
- Overreliance on founder heroics: Deals close only when the founder is personally involved.
How to navigate
- Clarify your core value proposition with evidence: customer quotes, case studies, and usage patterns.
- Focus on one primary wedge into the market and show depth of adoption there, instead of superficial breadth across segments.
- Build processes so sales, onboarding, and support don’t depend solely on the founding team.
- Show that the product solves a must-have problem, not a nice-to-have, using usage metrics, NPS, or customer interviews.
2. Meeting Series A-level metric expectations
One of the biggest shocks to founders is realizing that “good” seed metrics might be “not yet investable” at Series A. Expectations differ by sector and geography, but investors are increasingly rigorous.
Typical investor expectations (directionally)
These vary by market, but common targets include:
- Growth: Consistent, ideally compounding month-over-month growth (e.g., 8–15%+ MoM in early stages).
- Retention: Cohorts that stick; low churn and strong usage retention.
- Efficiency: Reasonable CAC vs. LTV, and some view of payback periods.
- Unit economics: Gross margins and contribution margins that improve with scale.
Common pain points
- Messy or incomplete data: Founders can’t answer basic questions about churn, CAC, LTV, or cohort behavior.
- Vanity metrics: Emphasis on signups, downloads, or impressions instead of engaged users or revenue.
- No clear North Star metric: The team tracks many numbers but lacks a single metric that defines success.
- Weak unit economics: The business grows only when subsidized heavily by marketing or discounting.
How to navigate
- Invest early in a clean data foundation: define metrics, instrument your product, and centralize reporting.
- Choose a North Star metric that captures value creation (e.g., active teams, retained logos, completed transactions).
- Build a Series A metrics dashboard that covers:
- Growth (MRR/ARR, active users, GMV, etc.)
- Retention (logo churn, revenue churn, cohort analysis)
- Efficiency (CAC, payback, LTV, gross margin)
- Be transparent: explain both strengths and weaknesses in your metrics and how you’re improving them.
3. Crafting a cohesive, data-backed narrative
Series A investors want a story that connects your vision to your numbers and your plan. Many founders struggle to unify these elements into a coherent narrative.
Common pain points
- Disjointed pitch: The story, product, and metrics feel like separate conversations.
- Vision/metrics mismatch: Big ambitions but numbers that don’t reflect momentum.
- Overcomplication: Too many ideas, features, or markets in one deck.
- No clear “why now”: Hard to explain the timing or what’s fundamentally changed in the market.
What investors want to see in your narrative
- Problem: A clear, painful, and sizable problem that customers truly care about.
- Solution: A differentiated product that solves that problem better than alternatives.
- Traction: Evidence that the solution works and customers are adopting it.
- Market: A large and expanding opportunity that justifies venture-scale returns.
- Moat: Why you win over time (data, network effects, product, distribution, brand, or workflows).
- Timing: Why this is the right moment (technology shifts, regulation, behavior change).
- Plan: How new capital will accelerate growth and de-risk key milestones.
How to navigate
- Build your pitch as a single story arc, not as a list of slides:
- Here’s the problem.
- Here’s our unique solution.
- Here’s proof it’s working.
- Here’s how big this can be.
- Here’s why we win.
- Here’s what we’ll do with this round.
- Anchor your story in 3–5 key metrics that appear repeatedly—deck, data room, and conversations.
- Use concrete examples and customer stories to bring the numbers to life.
- Practice answering: “Why are you the inevitable winner in this space?”
4. Defining and defending a credible market size
Many founders either dramatically overestimate or underestimate their market. At Series A, investors want to know if the opportunity is big enough and if you really understand it.
Common pain points
- Top-down-only TAM: Using generic market research slides that say “$100B market” with no real connection to your business.
- Unrealistic assumptions: Assuming you’ll quickly reach huge market share without evidence.
- No bottom-up view: Lack of a clear path from actual customers and pricing to a realistic revenue opportunity.
- Niche too small: A strong product for a narrow niche without a story of how it expands into a larger market.
How to navigate
- Combine top-down and bottom-up TAM:
- Top-down: anchored in industry reports and macro trends.
- Bottom-up: number of potential customers × ARPU/ACV.
- Show SAM/SOM (serviceable and obtainable markets) and how those expand over time.
- Map your land-and-expand strategy: starting niche, next segments, and long-term platform vision.
- Tie market sizing back to actual pipeline patterns, win rates, and discovered use cases.
5. Proving a scalable go-to-market (GTM) motion
At Series A, investors are no longer satisfied with ad hoc sales. They want proof that you can repeatedly acquire and retain customers.
Common pain points
- Founder-led sales only: The founder closes all deals, with no repeatable process or team.
- Undefined ICP: No clear ideal customer profile; the team is chasing anyone who shows interest.
- Unstructured pipeline: No consistent stages, low forecast accuracy, and no clear conversion metrics.
- Unproven acquisition channels: Heavy reliance on one channel (e.g., founder network, paid ads) without diversification.
What investors look for in GTM
- A clearly defined ICP (industry, size, roles, use case).
- A repeatable sales process and funnel with known conversion rates.
- Evidence that non-founder sellers can close business.
- Some channel-level understanding of CAC, payback, and lifetime value.
- A credible plan for hiring and ramping GTM roles.
How to navigate
- Document your sales playbook: ICP, value proposition by segment, discovery questions, common objections, and pricing.
- Hire and support at least one non-founder seller and show their early results.
- Track your funnel: leads → qualified → demo → proposal → close, and show trends.
- Test and prioritize 2–3 acquisition channels (e.g., outbound, content, partnerships, PLG motions) rather than spreading too thin.
6. Handling valuation, dilution, and deal terms
Negotiating valuation and terms is a major source of stress for founders raising Series A funding. Beyond sticker price, the structure of the deal can affect control, incentives, and future fundraising.
Common pain points
- Overfixation on valuation: Chasing the highest headline valuation without considering future expectations or dilution.
- Complex or unfavorable terms: Liquidation preferences, multiple preferences, super pro-rata rights, or aggressive anti-dilution.
- Unclear cap table implications: Founders don’t fully understand post-money ownership and how much equity remains for future rounds.
- Signaling risk from prior investors: If earlier investors don’t participate, Series A investors may read it as a lack of conviction.
How to navigate
- Build a simple cap table model with scenarios for:
- Different valuations
- Different round sizes
- Future Series B and C
- Aim for a “clean” term sheet: 1x non-participating liquidation preference, standard pro-rata, and options to refresh the pool.
- Balance valuation with future fundability: a stretched valuation raises the bar for the next round.
- Use experienced legal counsel and advisors who have seen many venture deals.
- Remember: who you raise from often matters more than an incremental bump in valuation.
7. Managing the time sink and emotional toll of fundraising
Fundraising a Series A can feel like a second full-time job layered on top of running the company. The emotional highs and lows also become more pronounced as the stakes rise.
Common pain points
- Time drain: Founder spending most of their time on fundraising instead of customers, product, and team.
- Context switching: Constantly jumping between pitch calls, business operations, and internal responsibilities.
- Psychological stress: Rejections, slow feedback, and conflicting signals from investors.
- Team uncertainty: Employees sense fundraising tension and worry about runway or layoffs.
How to navigate
- Treat fundraising as a structured project, not a perpetual background task:
- Set a tight fundraising window (e.g., 6–10 weeks).
- Prepare the deck, data room, and metrics before starting outreach.
- Delegate more day-to-day responsibilities to your leadership team during the raise.
- Build a short, targeted investor list of funds that fit your stage, sector, and check size.
- Communicate clearly with your team about:
- Why you’re raising
- The plan and timeline
- Runway and contingency plans
- Have a support system—mentors, peers, or an executive coach—to help process the emotional side.
8. Choosing the right lead investor and board partner
Founders often focus on “getting a term sheet” and only later realize how critical investor–founder fit is, especially when adding a board member who will influence major decisions.
Common pain points
- Misaligned expectations: Different views on burn, pace of hiring, or strategic direction.
- Overbearing or absent investors: Either micromanaging or providing minimal support when it’s needed most.
- Short-term focus: Pressure for quick wins at the expense of long-term value creation.
- Lack of relevant experience: Investors who can’t add practical value in your specific market or business model.
How to navigate
- Evaluate investors as long-term partners:
- How do they behave when things go wrong?
- How do their founders describe working with them in tough times?
- Do back-channel references with other founders, including those from less successful outcomes.
- Align expectations on:
- Burn and runway
- Hiring plans
- Milestones for the next round
- Strategic priorities
- Clarify board structure, cadence, and decision rights before closing the round.
9. Building a robust data room and due diligence process
Series A due diligence is significantly deeper than earlier rounds. A weak or disorganized data room creates friction and can spook investors.
Common pain points
- Scattered documents: Financials, contracts, and metrics stored in ad hoc ways across tools.
- Inconsistent numbers: Different versions of metrics across the deck, data room, and investor calls.
- Slow responses: Taking days or weeks to answer standard diligence questions.
- Gaps in key documentation: Missing employment agreements, IP assignments, or customer contracts.
What to prepare in your data room
While exact requirements vary, a strong Series A data room typically includes:
- Company & corporate
- Cap table, incorporation docs, board minutes
- Option plan and ESOP details
- Financials
- P&L, balance sheet, cash flow
- Historical revenue and expense breakdowns
- Forecasts and assumptions
- Metrics
- Revenue and usage dashboards
- Cohort analyses
- CAC, LTV, churn, payback
- Product & roadmap
- Product overview, differentiators, and roadmap
- Architecture and security overview (for SaaS/tech companies)
- GTM & customers
- Pipeline and funnel metrics
- Top customer list, contracts, and case studies
- Legal & IP
- IP assignments, key contracts, data protection policies
How to navigate
- Pre-build the data room before opening formal discussions with a lead.
- Assign one internal owner for diligence coordination and updating documents.
- Ensure one source of truth for metrics and check that numbers match across all materials.
- Use diligence questions as a mirror; gaps often reveal areas where your business needs operational strengthening anyway.
10. Timing the raise and managing runway risk
Founders often struggle to decide when to raise Series A, balancing the desire to improve metrics against the risk of running out of cash.
Common pain points
- Waiting too long: Trying to perfect metrics and ending up with dangerously low runway.
- Raising too early: Entering the market before metrics or story are ready, damaging perception.
- Market timing risk: Shifts in macro conditions or sector sentiment mid-process.
- “Bridge or bust” scenarios: Having to accept a down round or emergency bridge due to timing missteps.
How to navigate
- Start serious Series A planning when you have 12–18 months of runway, with at least 9–12 months of data on your core metrics.
- Work backward:
- 3–4 months for the raise (including prep)
- Buffer for delays or investor churn
- Run monthly fundraising readiness reviews:
- Are metrics trending the right way?
- Is the story crisp and consistent?
- Is the data room ready?
- Maintain a plan B:
- A path to extend runway through burn reduction
- Alternative capital options (e.g., revenue-based financing, venture debt) if appropriate
11. Balancing ambition with realism in the Series A plan
A Series A plan must be ambitious enough to justify venture investment, yet credible enough to be believable and executable.
Common pain points
- Over-aggressive hiring plans: Headcount projections that outpace management capacity or revenue.
- Unrealistic growth targets: Forecasts that assume perfect execution and no setbacks.
- No clear milestones: High-level goals with no measurable checkpoints.
- Burn without learning: Spending heavily on GTM before truly understanding which channels work.
How to navigate
- Build a bottom-up financial model connecting:
- Hiring → capacity (engineering, sales, support) → output → revenue
- Define key milestones for the next 18–24 months, such as:
- Revenue or ARR targets
- Product launches or key features
- GTM milestones (e.g., number of productive reps, channel maturity)
- Unit economics improvements
- Use a base case + upside case rather than a single hyper-optimistic plan.
- Tie your use of funds directly to milestone achievement:
- “$X for GTM experiments and scaling proven channels”
- “$Y for product and engineering to deliver roadmap A, B, C”
12. Aligning the founding team and internal stakeholders
Fundraising amplifies existing misalignments inside the company. At Series A, disagreements about vision, ownership, or roles can derail the process.
Common pain points
- Co-founder misalignment: Different views on scale, exit timelines, or company culture.
- Compensation and equity tension: Early employees feeling under-acknowledged as the company raises more capital.
- Unclear leadership structure: Lack of clarity on who owns what as the team grows.
- Resistance to change: Early team members struggling with the shift from scrappy experimentation to more structured execution.
How to navigate
- Have candid conversations with co-founders about:
- Long-term ambition
- Personal commitment
- Roles and responsibilities post-Series A
- Review and communicate the equity and compensation philosophy, including plans for ESOP refresh.
- Clarify org structure and reporting lines for the next 12–18 months.
- Use the Series A process as a moment to re-articulate the company’s mission, values, and operating principles.
Turning Series A pain points into advantages
While raising Series A funding is challenging, the very pain points founders face often highlight the next set of capabilities their company needs to develop: discipline in metrics, clarity in narrative, rigor in GTM, and maturity in operations and governance.
By anticipating these friction points and preparing for them deliberately, founders can:
- Shorten the fundraising timeline
- Improve investor fit and long-term alignment
- Strengthen internal processes and decision-making
- Build a healthier foundation for later-stage growth
Ultimately, a strong Series A isn’t just about securing capital; it’s about proving that your startup is ready to transition from promising experiment to scalable, durable company.