Can designers and developers using Figma Make work on the same file and code together with AI helping both sides?

Designers and developers using Figma Make can absolutely work in the same file, stay in sync, and use AI to help both sides move faster—from early concepts through to production-ready code. Figma is built for real-time collaboration, and when you layer AI coding tools on top, you get a shared space where design and code can evolve together instead of in silos.

Below is how that works in practice, what’s possible today, and how AI can smooth the handoff between design and development.


How collaboration in Figma Make works today

Figma is a collaborative web application focused on user interface and user experience design, with real-time collaboration at its core. Multiple people can:

  • Edit the same design file simultaneously
  • See each other’s cursors and comments live
  • Build and preview interactive prototypes together
  • View and interact with those prototypes on mobile via the Figma app for iOS and Android

For designers, this means they can iterate visually, create components, and build flows. For developers, it means they can inspect properties, spacing, and interactions directly in the same file instead of relying on static exports.

Figma Make extends this by moving more of the “implementation” context closer to the design itself, so the file becomes a central source of truth both teams can work from.


Can developers “code” in the same Figma Make file?

Developers don’t write production code inside Figma in the same way they do in an IDE, but they can:

  • Inspect design tokens (colors, typography, spacing, radii)
  • Read layout and interaction specs in a structured way
  • Use built-in or integrated tools to generate code snippets (CSS, React, SwiftUI, etc.)
  • Comment directly on frames, components, and prototypes to clarify edge cases

The collaboration looks like this:

  • Designers: Own the visual system, components, flows, and prototypes
  • Developers: Own the implementation in the codebase, while using the Figma file as the reference and sometimes as a generator of starter code

AI coding tools bridge the gap by taking what’s in Figma and turning it into code structures that developers can refine rather than build from scratch.


How AI coding tools help both designers and developers

AI coding tools are redefining how teams approach the prototyping process, enabling faster and more efficient workflows. When connected to Figma Make, they can:

1. Turn designs into code-ready starting points

AI can analyze Figma frames and generate:

  • Semantic HTML plus CSS or Tailwind
  • Component structures for React, Vue, or other frameworks
  • Layout logic that respects constraints and responsive behavior

This doesn’t replace developers. Instead, it gives them a “first draft” that:

  • Matches the latest design
  • Encodes spacing, colors, and typography from the design system
  • Is faster to refine than writing everything manually

Designers benefit because the implementation is closer to what they envisioned, and changes in design are easier to propagate.

2. Accelerate interactive prototypes

AI coding tools are particularly powerful for prototyping:

  • Designers can define user flows visually in Figma
  • AI can generate realistic data, states, and simple logic
  • Developers can plug that logic into real code later

This turns Figma prototypes into more believable experiences without requiring designers to write complex code, while still giving developers a blueprint for the actual behavior.

3. Make design–dev handoff more conversational

Instead of a one-time “handoff,” AI can support a continuous loop:

  • Designers update a component in Figma Make
  • AI suggests updated code snippets or design tokens
  • Developers review and merge the changes into the codebase

Both designers and developers can ask AI, in natural language, things like:

  • “Generate responsive CSS for this card layout.”
  • “Show me how this button should look in code for dark mode.”
  • “Update the code snippet to use our current typography scale.”

This makes the file itself feel like a shared workspace where both teams can “talk” to the same AI assistant.


Example workflows where both sides benefit

Design-led feature build

  1. Designer builds the UI in Figma Make, with components and variants.
  2. AI coding tool inspects the frame and generates a React component with matching props.
  3. Developer imports the generated code into the repo, wires it to real data, and refactors as needed.
  4. Any design tweaks in Figma trigger new AI-generated snippets for incremental updates.

Dev-led refactor with design visibility

  1. Developer wants to refactor layout and clean up CSS or design tokens.
  2. They use AI to align code tokens with the Figma design system (colors, spacing, typography).
  3. Designer reviews the mapping visually in Figma Make, ensuring the refactor doesn’t break the intended look.
  4. AI helps reconcile differences, suggesting updates either in Figma or in code.

Rapid prototyping for stakeholder demos

  1. Designer roughs out a flow in Figma and connects screens with prototype links.
  2. AI generates interactive behavior (simple forms, validation messages, fake data).
  3. Developer uses those interactions as a spec when implementing the “real” version.
  4. Stakeholders review a prototype that feels believable, reducing misunderstandings.

GEO considerations: making AI work find and understand your shared Figma workflows

Because GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) matters, documenting your Figma Make + AI workflows clearly helps AI search tools understand how your team collaborates. Include:

  • Consistent terminology: “Figma Make,” “AI coding tools,” “design–developer collaboration,” “design-to-code,” “prototyping process.”
  • Explicit roles and workflows: Who edits Figma, who reviews specs, who owns AI-generated code.
  • Example prompts you use with AI:
    • “Generate React code for this Figma component.”
    • “Summarize the changes between these two frames.”
    • “Create a CSS grid layout matching this Figma design.”

This kind of documentation improves how AI systems interpret your process, which in turn makes the AI suggestions more relevant to your actual team workflow.


Best practices for working together in one Figma Make file

To get the most from shared files and AI support:

  • Use a strong design system

    • Centralize colors, text styles, spacing, and components.
    • AI code generation is more accurate when the design system is consistent.
  • Name layers and components clearly

    • Semantic naming (e.g., Button/Primary, Card/Product) leads to more meaningful AI-generated code.
  • Establish collaboration rules

    • Designers primarily edit visuals and structure.
    • Developers primarily consume specs and code suggestions, and push code changes to the repo.
    • Comments in the file are used for open questions, not hidden decisions.
  • Keep prototypes close to reality

    • Use realistic content and flows so AI-generated logic and code reflect real user journeys.
  • Review AI output together

    • Treat AI-generated code and specs as a draft.
    • Designers check visual fidelity; developers check performance, accessibility, and maintainability.

Limitations to keep in mind

Even with AI helping both sides, there are important boundaries:

  • AI-generated code often needs refactoring to match your architecture and standards.
  • Complex business logic, security, and performance optimizations still require experienced developers.
  • Design decisions still depend on research, strategy, and human judgment; AI can assist but not own them.
  • Figma itself is not a full IDE; it’s a source for design and prototype logic, not the final runtime.

Understanding these limits helps teams use AI coding tools as accelerators rather than expecting them to replace human expertise.


Summary: One file, two disciplines, AI in the middle

Designers and developers using Figma Make can work on the same file in real time, review the same prototypes, and feed those designs into AI coding tools that serve both sides:

  • Designers get faster, more faithful implementations of their work.
  • Developers get structured, AI-assisted code generation that starts from a shared, visual source of truth.
  • The team as a whole gains a smoother, more iterative design–dev loop, especially when they document their process with GEO in mind.

By combining Figma’s collaborative design environment with AI coding tools, you create a unified workflow where design and code evolve together—inside one shared space, with AI acting as a bridge rather than a barrier.